<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Understanding ISO/IEC 17025:2005</title>
    <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm</link>
    <description>A2LA Criteria Council Approved Applications to the Standard</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>4.11.2 What is meant by a “root cause” investigation and how do I go about this?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=115</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG115Nov62009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.6.3 What specific items does A2LA look for in my purchasing documents in order to meet the requirements in Section 4.6.3?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=113</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG113Sep102009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.13.2.3 What is considered an “equivalent measure” for avoiding loss or change of original data that is stored electronically?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=114</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG114Sep102009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.3.2.1 Is the master list my lab created to meet Section 4.3.2.1 of the Standard considered a record or is it considered a document that would be subject to document control requirements?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=109</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG109Aug62009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.9.1 What sort of quality control practices can my laboratory implement for destructive and/or pass/fail types of tests in which no equipment is used?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=110</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG110Aug62009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.5 My laboratory is part of a multi-laboratory organization.  All laboratories within my organization are A2LA accredited and fall under the classification of a “branch system” as defined by A2LA.  If my laboratory receives work from a client but sends the work to another of our accredited branch laboratories (with the final report being issued by my laboratory), is this considered sub-contracting?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=111</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG111Aug62009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.1.5b Do the clauses 4.1.5 (b) and (d) require our laboratory to have a Code of Ethics in place?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=112</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG112Aug62009</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.5.9 Does the requirement in Section 5.5.9 apply to equipment that has been sent out for calibration?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=108</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG108Sep42008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.7.2 In what ways may a laboratory seek feedback, and how must this feedback be analyzed?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=65</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG65Jul102008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.15.1 Who is considered to be a laboratory’s “top management”?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=52</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG52Jun52008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.5.1 During the assessment, does my laboratory have to have at least one piece of M&amp;TE available for demonstration for each test/measurement on our Scope of Accreditation?  What if my laboratory uses rental equipment to perform tests/measurements on our Scope…Would we be required to have at least one piece of this rental equipment available for demonstration for each test/measurement that the rental equipment is used for?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=92</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG92Jun52008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.2.2 Does section 4.2.2 require that all of the quality policy statement elements (4.2.2 a - e) be contained in one contiguous statement? Or can the elements be addressed in different areas of the quality manual?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=99</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG99Jun52008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.14.1 I am a new laboratory getting ready to apply for accreditation.  Do I have to perform a complete internal audit of my management system and testing activities before I can become accredited?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=105</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG105Jun52008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.15 I am a new laboratory getting ready to apply for accreditation.  Do I have to perform my management review before I can become accredited?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=106</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG106Jun52008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.3.1 What is expected by way of document control for software as required in Section 4.3.1?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=107</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG107Jun52008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.2.1 For one particular test/measurement on our laboratory’s Scope of Accreditation, we only have one person in our laboratory that is competent to perform the test.  During the assessment, must that person be available for demonstration for each test/measurement on our Scope that only they are capable of performing?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=93</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG93May62008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.4.7.2 a) What is required for software validation?  If off-the-shelf software is used, must a laboratory also verify that software?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=28</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG28Apr132008</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.10 My laboratory is internal to a larger, manufacturing organization.  Test results are communicated from the laboratory via an intranet to another department of the organization which prepares and issues the final test reports, but they may or may not contain all of the elements of Section 5.10.2 through 5.10.4.  Can a deficiency be cited against our laboratory for non-compliance with these clauses of ISO/IEC 17025?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=97</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG97Dec62007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.10.2 j What is considered to be an “equivalent identification of the person(s) authorizing a test report or calibration certificate”?  Is only an electronic signature or mark considered acceptable and equivalent?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=103</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG103Dec62007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.10.4.4 Our calibration laboratory is “captive” and part of a larger original equipment manufacturer (OEM).  The items manufactured by our company are accompanied by a calibration certificate generated from our laboratory, however the recipient of this equipment is not known at the time of calibration.  Our company would like for us to include a recalibration interval on the calibration certificates, but since the ultimate recipient of the equipment is not known, we cannot obtain their prior approval to include this interval.  Is it still alright for us to include it on the calibration certificate?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=104</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG104Dec62007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.14.1 My laboratory performs an internal audit annually per our predetermined schedule and procedure.  Since we have over 100 test methods on our Scope of Accreditation, we do not address all elements of our management system and its compliance to ISO 17025 during each audit, nor do we address every test method defined on our Scope of Accreditation. Instead, we audit a sampling of the management system and methods at each interval. Are we required to perform an audit on all elements of our management system and its compliance to ISO 17025 and an audit of all testing methods defined on our Scope of Accreditation at each audit interval?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=102</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG102Oct42007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.2.6 My laboratory’s quality manual contains clear statements of the roles and responsibilities for our quality manager and technical management.  However, none of these explicitly state that they are responsible for the laboratory’s compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.  Does this warrant a deficiency?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=100</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG100Sep62007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.13.2.1 (Note 1) How does Note 1 from Section 4.13.2.1 apply to my laboratory?  My lab runs a significant number of the same tests each day.  It seems impractical for me to record and retain so much original data when my customers do not wish to receive this additional information with their final test reports.</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=101</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG101Sep62007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.3.1 What does A2LA consider to be “normative documents” that my laboratory must control under our document control system?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=98</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG98Jul122007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.6.2 Must the records of actions taken to check compliance of received supplies, services and/or consumable materials be tied to the specific shipment/box/lot of material received?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=85</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG85Jun142007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.5.1 During the assessment, does my laboratory have to have at least one piece of MT&amp;E available for demonstration for each test/measurement on our Scope of Accreditation?  What if my laboratory uses rental equipment to perform tests/measurements on our Scope…</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=91</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG91Jun142007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.1.4, 4.1.5 What is meant by “key personnel”?  Is this different from A2LA’s term “essential personnel”?  Who should I consider “key” vs. “essential”?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=94</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG94Jun142007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Advertising Policy, Section 11 Since my clients do not need or require my A2LA accreditation, I do not issue endorsed test/calibration reports and my contract review records clearly indicate that I am not required to conduct tests/calibrations under accredited conditions for these customers.  As such, I feel I am not obligated to meet all of the accreditation requirements, particularly those related to the Traceability Policy, and so none of my equipment is calibrated by an appropriately accredited calibration laboratory.  Is this appropriate?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=95</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG95Jun142007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5.2.1, 5.2.5 Must my laboratory maintain records of actual competency data for all technical personnel?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=96</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG96Jun142007</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4.11.4 Does my laboratory have to maintain records to show that we have monitored the results of corrective actions taken?</title>
      <link>http://www.a2la.org/faq/faqfinder170252005.cfm?faqpk=81</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">A2LAORG81May32007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

